Archived: http://www.jophan.org/mimosa/m18/18_p35.html on 02/15/01

> We close this issue with something a bit different. Some of you may be familiar with Mystery Science
Theater 3000
, which appears on the cable television network Comedy Central. It's a show about bad
movie, mad scientists, bad movies, an intrepid space-faring janitor and his wise-cracking robot sidekicks,
bad movies, and of course, bad movies. Anyway, it's all greatly amusing to watch, and yes, we're *big*
fans. In a recent viewer's poll, the best episode of the entire series was MST's lampooning of a low-
budget movie titled Manos: The Hands of Fate, a movie so awful that it easily rivals the worst productions
of Edward D. Wood, Jr. So why (and how) are movies like Manos made? You are about to find out!
'The Hand That Time Forgot' by Richard Brandt, illo by Diana Harlan Stein
"What kind of movie would a fertilizer salesman
from El Paso, Texas make?"

-- Michael Weldon,
The Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film
#
For many years, Manos: The Hands of Fate
must have been the Holy Grail for aficionados of
obscure, low-budget, really godawful cinema: sel-
dom mentioned, hardly ever seen, exactly the kind
of movie that, yes, a fertilizer salesman named Hal
P. Warren would decide to make, one fine summer
in 1966.

That all changed when the grandmeisters of la
cinema du fromage
at Mystery Science Theater 3000
delved into the bottom of the barrel and found this
epic lying in ambush. For those without access to
Comedy Central or some other clue, MST3K (for
short) is about two scientists who torture a space-
bound employee and his robot pals by force-feeding
them movies, into which they interject their own
snide remarks and alternative dialogue. Bad movies.
Really bad. Really, really, really bad.

As one of the scientists confided when Manos
came up for its turn, "I think even we may have
gone a little too far this time."

So, instant cult phenomenon. Even if 'admir-
ers' is not quite the word, Manos has been embraced
by legions of 'MSTies' and cult film fans who pas-
sionately argue its demerits over the Internet. Even
Roger Ebert's forum on Compuserve isn't safe.
And yet, as we shall see, there very nearly
wasn't a Manos: The Hands of Fate at all.

How to describe Manos fairly? I tell locals
that it's about a couple who take a wrong turn on
Scenic Drive (that being the one landmark in the
film still recognizable after three decades) and wind
up at a 'Lodge' managed by a cult leader, his wob-
bly-kneed sidekick, and his harem of lingerie-clad
wives. Wow; a cult movie that's really a cult
movie!

"So, Richard," my fellow film buff Craig tells
me over the phone, "for the next Amigocon you
should really round up some of the cast and have a
reunion panel."

"Hmmm," I said, the gears in my brain starting
to grind away implacably. Problem is, how to locate
some of these folks thirty years after? Assuming
they're not dead, who would have hung around
after perpetrating something like Manos upon the
townfolk?

Suddenly my dreams are haunted by the spec-
tre of Manos. In my sleep I can see myself after
grueling detective work uncovering a fugitive cast
member; hey, that little girl who played the daughter
must still be alive by now eh? Only why hasn't she
aged any by now.... Aggggggh! Time to wake up,
eh? To the rescue: my old pal Roy, who springs on

01
->